The police said that it takes a long time and could not immediately bring the results to the public, it is expected that all parties can exercise restraint and be patient. But while waiting for the police investigation was, it would be easy us to us to analyze what is the intent of the content of the sentence horrendous mass media recently this.
Without add and subtract, let's together we see: It is reported that at an event in the Thousand Islands, Ahok discuss the plans for a program. Ahok then associate the plan with the agenda the election of Jakarta in 2017 and positions itself as the incumbent non-Muslim.
After a video uploaded to the internet, many people view and respond to that Ahok been harassing letters Al Maidah 51, then insured the news in the media and crowded-insured the reporter asked for clarification Ahok as perpetrators video the. Some time later, Ahok back provide clarifications related to the revelation. At City Hall, Ahok claimed she did not mean to offend Muslims let alone to degrading religion.
"No I mean insulting the Koran. You can see how it looked like, " he admitted. According to his testimony, Ahok when it alluded to Surat Al-Maidah verse 51 in the hope that no residents were misinterpreted. "
One Thousand Island was none are offended, we laugh anyway. The intention at that time just wanted to show, actually, I do not want people who have such an interpretation was confused, " he said.
The definition of the phrase Ahok it could be interpreted like this," so yes mother father, until later that the father and mother regret not choosing me for the contents of the womb Al Maidah 51, then you go to hell while your desire is personally choose me, you are right. "It's the same with Ahok say that religion has curb a person's right to make choices, because there is no prohibition in the Qur'an not to be choosing the leader of the group Jews and Christians, then he is not free to choose their own because there is the threat of hell inside.
Indeed everyone has his own free will whether he had any command in the religion and the religion. In this case Ahok want to say to the citizens of the Thousand Islands that all people have equal rights in determining the choice, do not need to be guided by the rules of religion and so on.
Feedback People: In this case Ahok indeed talk that everyone has the freedom to make choices, each people have good will (the deepest desire) respectively, but the basis of an attitude that freedom must be based on the will and personal awareness that are not influenced by others, not at all influenced by anything, including scripture, let alone to talk that Surah Al Maidah 51 have lied to them. Not like it if Ahok want to drive voters made the choice, not by bringing the beliefs of others, and as if he wanted to laugh and make fun of the religion.
When people make choices, which on the basis of personal liking (good will), whether he want a leader of the Muslim or non-Muslim, was first assessed how leaders behave and speak words, if the leader has a good attitude, politeness, respect other people's beliefs. No need to look at the content of the letter Al Maidah 51 any person it will automatically choose the leader of the good.
But if you look at the behavior of leaders who are arrogant, insulting other people's religion, love to make noise and chaos of the community, on the basis of personal desires it, without need browse the contents of Al Maidah 51 any person would not choose bad leaders like that.
And if in the journey these voters found that there are scholars spoke to did not elect a leader by virtue Al Maidah verse 51, then it will go back to the deepest desires these people, if he agrees and accepts the invitation, then Ahok have to accept it. And if there is a reject or ignore calls to these scholars, the scholars nor the power to force people to change stance that person. Please feel free to make choices based on personal preferences of each. That is what we call democracy.
That is the real form of the desire (good will) everyone, the basic desire of a person affected by the data and information supporting the most fundamental is the ability of the leader soothing citizens with seriousness and sincerity to make a better life. A good leader in the eyes of most Muslims is a leader that mandate, Ahok can not even shown himself capable of being a good let alone a mandate.
So when a leader talk to the citizens that you should use it choose you, and do not want to be lied to by the contents of the content of scripture, then that is where the contents of the real issue. No word "lied" on behalf of a verse in the holy book of Muslims, Ahok already entered the realm of religion that she should not have entered. He has tried to influence the deepest desire of others to reject what is there in religion to make a choice on him on the basis of these words. Though the above description has been mentioned, that the main basis of people choose a leader is not entirely based upon the religious orders, but there are many things that affect and the largest is the attitude and behavior of the leader.
But what do Ahok is absolutely scandalous, not yet entered the campaign he wants to win the hearts of voters in a way to laugh at the attitude of people who are considered irrational. He wondered why there are still alot of people do not want to act on the basis of personal whim. Still chained rules and have been defined in scripture. This conversation then unknowingly hurt Muslims and that what is rolling today.
Reflecting on what happened in Paris few time ago, a news agency called "Charlie Hedbo" often angered the Muslim community there because he always made caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad on its front page with the behavior and bring tickle funny messages and laugh. Many Muslims are angry and condemn this newspaper, because it is insensitive and disrespectful of other people's beliefs. Until finally there was what happened to the newspaper that, a terrible tragedy there. In this case the offender only caricatured, while going on here is an insult to the Koran. Obviously the problem is greater than is the case in Paris.
Similar to what happened in the case of this Ahok. Under conditions of a joke and frolic Ahok speak in a thousand islands in the framework of his working visit he had made a veiled campaign, but the campaign has not started, and he already stole start. He talked about things that are not supposed to be the authority and duties in remote areas far from the capital, as if he speaks no one will ever see and pay attention then laughed uproariously fun of people who still choose leaders based on religion. No wonder if now all Muslims angry wants to try him to court? It is very normal that tomorrow on Friday the 4 November 2016 is celebrated as the Defamation of religion by Ahok, thousands of people will take to the streets and chanted so Ahok immediately brought to justice.
This is the state that is a pity, because even the government is not able to resolve this issue and prevent the occurrence of a crowd of thousands of people gathered the next few days. IN variety of milling media issues that talk that there will be a lot of things can happen if the demonstration was still being done. We all must not wanted something happens in the historic, but the problem is why the state could not prevent and stop this action.
In fact, the number one in this country was not able to intervene and mediate, our president is busy with another job that was far more important than the problems split the nation. Even the religious minister was silent, the bearer party Ahok was silent, the parties law enforcement officers was slow to respond. Even Bawaslu was immobilized into spectators. And Ahok itself is still not held a ceremony to declare a public apology to all Muslims (especially the scholars), he had already expressed an apology but in passing not specifically declared himself sorry. And all parties were still as a statue respond to this condition. What's wrong with these people?
Is this issue needs the attention of the world's citizens, alias if it is published to the international world then this will be of particular concern the world Moslem. The international community will not only highlight the fact they will also judge the attitude of the government that this slow. What if the international media has issued a voice and their opinion and then the government is willing to move and hasten resolve this issue. If so, then say to Muslims internationally blasphemy that public officials do this. Later we will see how the government sigapnya deal with this issue if it has been under pressure from abroad.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar